Responding to The Gospel of Judas
R. Albert Mohler
Jr.
Headlines around the world
are announcing the publication of a "long lost" and
"suppressed" ancient document, known as The Gospel of Judas. The
National Geographic Society announced the publication at a major media event
April 6, just in time to boost publicity for its special on the National
Geographic Channel April 9.
The announcement led to a
frenzy of media coverage, ranging from responsible reports to outrageous
sensationalism. According to some commentators, the publication of this new
document will force a complete reformulation of Christianity and our
understanding of both Judas and Jesus. In reality, nothing of the sort is in
view. The document is highly interesting, however, offering an ancient and
authoritative source into the thinking of heretical groups who offered
alternative understandings of Christianity.
The document purports to be
written by Judas, even though it certainly was written long after Judas's death.
Nevertheless, the very existence of this document, rooted in the third century
after Christ, indicates something of the struggle Christian leaders confronted
in defining and defending the authentic Gospel against heretical groups such as
the Gnostics.
A quick look at The Gospel
of Judas reveals the contrast between this document and the four canonical
Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. The English version, edited by Rudolphe
Kasser, Marvin Meyer, and Gregor Wurst, presents an accessible and readable
version of the portions of the Codex Tchacos now available. The most remarkable
feature of this text is its thoroughly Gnostic character. The substance of this
Gospel bears virtually no resemblance to orthodox Christianity -- a fact which
explains why the early church recognized this writing for what it is, and
rejected it as neither authoritative nor authentic.
In "The Lost Gospel:
The Quest for the Gospel of Judas Iscariot," Herbert Krosney explains how
the codex was discovered and traces the events that led to its publication in
English this week: "In the mid- to late 1970s, hidden for more than fifteen
hundred years, an ancient text emerged from the sands of Egypt. Near the banks
of the Nile River, some Egyptian peasants, fellahin, stumbled upon a
cavern. In biblical times, such chambers had been used to bury the dead. The
peasants entered the cave, seeking ancient gold or jewelry, anything of value
that they could sell. Instead, among a pile of human bones, they discovered a
crumbling limestone box. Inside it, they came upon an unexpected find -- a
mysterious leather-bound book, a codex."
The portion of the text that
is now translated is taken from 13 pages of papyrus, with the text written in
Coptic, a language of ancient Egypt. Most scholars agree that The Gospel of
Judas was originally written in Greek, and later translated into Coptic. This
was the common history of many Gnostic texts, especially those associated with
groups common to the area in which the manuscript was found.
"The Lost Gospel"
reads like a suspense thriller at times, tracing the odd and admittedly
remarkable story of how the codex was preserved and eventually published. Those
familiar with the story of the Dead Sea scrolls and the documents of the Nag
Hammadi library will recognize significant parallels in the saga of how the
texts and manuscripts were found and eventually made available for scholarly
review and publication.
The Gnostic character of the
text is immediately evident. In his supposed conversations with Judas, Jesus
speaks in Gnostic categories such as "aeons" and an "eternal
realm." Judas is identified as the "thirteenth spirit" who was
appointed by God to be the agent of releasing Jesus from the physical body in
which He was trapped in the incarnation.
When Judas speaks of a
vision and asks for its interpretation, Jesus answers: "Judas, your star
has led you astray." Jesus continues: "No person of mortal birth is
worthy to enter the house you have seen, for that place is reserved for the
holy. Neither the sun nor the moon will rule there, nor the day, but the holy
will abide there always, in the eternal realm with the holy angels. Look, I have
explained to you the mysteries of the kingdom and I have taught you about the
error of the stars; and ... sent it ... on the twelve aeons."
The concept of secret and
mysterious knowledge was central to Gnostic sects. The Gospel of Judas purports
to reveal conversations between Jesus and Judas that had been kept secret from
the rest of humanity. The Gnostics prized their secret knowledge, and taught a
profound dualism between the material and spiritual worlds. They understood the
material world, including the entire cosmos, to be a trap for the spiritual
world. In essence, the Gnostics sought to escape the material world and to enter
the world of spirit.
Accordingly, the most
revealing statement in the entire text of The Gospel of Judas records Jesus
saying to Judas, "But you will exceed all of them. For you will sacrifice
the man that clothes me." In other words, Judas would perform a service to
Jesus by betraying Him to those who would then crucify Him, liberating Jesus
from the physical body and freeing Him as spirit. As the editors of The Gospel
of Judas indicate in a footnote, "The death of Jesus, with the assistance
of Judas, is taken to be the liberation of the spiritual person within."
Needless to say, this is in
direct conflict with the Christian Gospel and the New Testament. The consistent
witness of the New Testament is that Jesus came in order to die for sinners --
willingly accepting the cross and dying as the substitutionary sacrifice for
sin.
This redemptive action is
completely missing from The Gospel of Judas. For that reason, the text was
rejected by early Christian leaders. Writing about the year 180, Irenaeus, a
major Christian figure among the early church fathers, identified the text now
known as The Gospel of Judas as heretical. In his foreword to "The Lost
Gospel," Bart Ehrman, a professor at the University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill, explains, "This gospel was about the relationship between
Jesus and Judas, and indicated that Judas didn't actually betray Jesus, but did
what Jesus wanted him to do, because Judas was the one who really knew the
truth, as Jesus wanted it communicated."
Ehrman, no friend to
orthodox Christianity, has correctly explained the problem. Irenaeus rejected
the text precisely because it was in direct conflict with the canonical Gospels
and with the teaching of the Apostles. Accordingly, it was his responsibility to
warn the church about the heretical nature of this document. Still, the very
fact that Irenaeus mentions the document with such a specific reference gives
considerable credence to the claim that The Gospel of Judas is as old in its
origin as its patrons now claim.
We now know a great deal
about the Gnostic sects common to the first centuries of Christianity. The
particular sect thought to be associated with the origin of The Gospel of Judas
was known as the Cainites. The peculiar teachings of this sect included the
rehabilitation of many characters presented negatively in the Bible -- starting
with Cain. In essence, the Cainites attempted to take the negative figures of
the Bible and present them in a heroic light. In order to do this, of course,
they had to create alternative texts and an alternative rendering of the story
of Jesus.
What are Christians to make
of all this? The publication of The Gospel of Judas is a matter of genuine
interest. After all, it is important for Christians to understand the context of
early Christianity -- a context in which the church was required to exercise
tremendous discernment in confronting heretical teachings and rejecting spurious
texts.
The scholarly research
behind the publication of The Gospel of Judas appears to be sound and
responsible. The codex manuscript was submitted to the most rigorous historical
process in terms of dating, chemical composition, and similar questions. In the
end, it appears that the document is most likely authentic, in terms of its
origin from within a heretical sect in the third century.
Nevertheless, extravagant
claims about the theological significance of The Gospel of Judas are
unwarranted, ridiculous, and driven by those who themselves call for a
reformulation of Christianity.
The resurgence of interest
in Gnostic texts such as The Gospel of Thomas and The Gospel of Judas is driven
by an effort, at least on the part of some figures, to argue that early
Christianity had no essential theological core. Instead, scholars such as Elaine
Pagels of Princeton University want to argue that, "These discoveries are
exploding the myth of a monolithic religion, and demonstrating how diverse --
and fascinating -- the early Christian movement really was." What Pagels
and many other figures argue is that early Christianity was a cauldron of
competing theologies, and that ideological and political factors explain why an
"orthodox" tradition eventually won, suppressing all competing
theologies. Accordingly, these same figures argue that today's Christians should
be open to these variant teachings that had long been suppressed and hidden from
view.
Metropolitan Bishoy, leader
of the Coptic Orthodox Church, dismissed The Gospel of Judas as
"non-Christian babbling resulting from a group of people trying to create a
false 'amalgam' between the Greek mythology and Far East religions with
Christianity... They were written by a group of people who were aliens to the
main Christian stream of the early Christianity. These texts are neither
reliable nor accurate Christian texts, as they are historically and logically
alien to the main Christian thinking and philosophy of the early and present
Christians." The Metropolitan is right, but we are better armed to face the
heresies of our own day if we face with honesty the heresies of times past.
Simon Gathercole, a New
Testament professor at Aberdeen University, defended the text as authentic, but
relatively unimportant. "It is certainly an ancient text, but not ancient
enough to tell us anything new," Gathercole explains. "It contains
themes which are alien to the first-century world of Jesus and Judas, but which
became popular later."
Indeed, those Gnostic ideas
did become popular later, and they are becoming increasingly popular now. The
truth of the Gospel stands, and Christians will retain firm confidence in the
authenticity of the New Testament and, in particular, of the Gospels of Matthew,
Mark, Luke and John. Nevertheless, old Gnosticisms are continually repackaged
and "rediscovered" even as new forms of Gnostic thought emerge in our
postmodern culture.
Informed Christians will be
watchful and aware when confronting churches or institutions that present
spurious writings, rejected as heretical by the early church, on the same plane
as the New Testament.
The verdict of Athanasius,
one of the greatest leaders of the early church, still stands: "Let no man
add to these, neither let him take ought from these, for concerning these the
Lord put to shame the Sadducees, and said, 'Ye do err, not knowing the
Scriptures.' And He reproved the Jews, saying, 'Search the Scriptures, for these
are they that testify of Me.'"